Using his own AI tools left Sam Altman feeling useless and it offers lessons for you

Sam Altman felt useless using AI and that says a lot

Sam Altman is one of the most influential people in artificial intelligence. He leads OpenAI and spends his days pushing these systems forward. So when he publicly admitted that using his own company’s tools made him feel a little useless, people paid attention fast.

His comment did not sound like hype or a product pitch. It sounded human. That mix of excitement and sadness hit a nerve across the tech world, especially among workers already wondering where they fit in an AI-driven future.

The moment an AI idea beat his own

Altman wrote on X that building an app with Codex was ‘very fun’ at first, but that when Codex suggested features he had not thought of, ‘I felt a little useless and it was sad.’

Then he asked Codex to suggest new features. He realized that at least a couple of the ideas were better than the ones he had been thinking of himself. That was the moment the mood shifted, and he admitted he felt a little useless and sad.

When your own tool outshines you

Codex is designed to do more than simple code suggestions. It can help write features, fix bugs, and even propose pull requests, all while being tightly connected to a developer’s codebase. It is built for what many now call vibe coding.

For someone like Altman, whose identity is deeply tied to building software and advancing AI, seeing his own product outperform his thinking felt personal. He later wrote that he was nostalgic for the present, even as he believed people would find better ways to spend their time.

The internet did not exactly offer sympathy

Altman’s vulnerability quickly spread online, but many reactions were harsh. Some workers who were already worried about AI replacing jobs saw his sadness as tone deaf. They argued that everyday employees face far more serious consequences than feeling upstaged by a tool.

An anonymous tech headhunter asked what average white-collar workers would feel when AI takes their jobs. Others accused him of being upset while sitting on huge wealth, as their own careers shifted toward supervising chatbots instead of doing the work they trained for.

Creative workers feel the pressure too

It was not only developers reacting. A food writer replied that she has watched her career disappear as AI systems produce what she called hollow copies of her work. She argued that those systems were trained on creative labor without consent.

Others used the moment to complain about OpenAI’s rapid product changes, including plans to phase out older models. They asked for more stability and transparency, showing that frustration with AI is not just emotional but also practical and professional.

Some tech leaders quietly agreed

Not everyone mocked Altman. Aditya Agarwal, former chief technology officer of Dropbox, said a weekend coding session with Anthropic’s Claude left him filled with wonder and profound sadness about where things are heading.

He wrote that we may never write code by hand again because it no longer makes sense. Coding was something he felt very good at, yet it now feels free and abundant, leaving him happy but also disoriented, sad, and confused.

A growing wave of AI anxiety

The emotions described by Altman and Agarwal are part of what many now call AI anxiety. Even experienced professionals are watching tools advance so quickly that their hard-won skills feel less central than they did just a few years ago.

This is not just about learning new software. It is about identity and self-worth. For many knowledge workers, their sense of value is closely tied to tasks that AI can now complete quickly and at a lower cost.

When the shock turns physical

The Conversation shared the story of Chris Brockett, a longtime Microsoft researcher featured in a book about AI pioneers. He described being rushed to the hospital after encountering an early AI system that could do much of what he had spent decades mastering.

Brockett thought he was having a heart attack. He later said his body reacted to the sight of a future in which he was not involved. That reaction shows how deeply people can connect their professional skills to their sense of purpose.

Even top scientists worry about relevance

MIT physicist Max Tegmark has also voiced concern that AI could eclipse abilities that give him a sense of self-worth and value in the job market. His worry reflects a broader fear among highly trained experts.

Professionals in different fields report that AI can now complete tasks they once relied on for income and status. The speed of progress makes it harder to mentally adjust, especially when changes arrive faster than expected.

Is this future inevitable?

Some economists argue that AI’s impact on work is not set in stone. Labor economist David Autor has suggested these tools could expand decision-making tasks beyond elite experts and improve job quality if used deliberately.

He frames the future of work with AI as a design problem rather than a prediction. In other words, societies and organizations can still choose how systems like Codex are deployed and who gets to benefit from their power.

A reminder not to take tech hype at face value

Wharton professor Peter Cappelli has warned that implementing AI tools across large organizations requires significant effort. He cautions against taking statements from tech leaders as proof that everything will change overnight.

He noted that people who build the technology often talk about what is possible rather than what is practical. That gap between promise and reality may slow the pace at which AI fully replaces human roles in many workplaces.

As AI dominates, the bigger question becomes readiness, which sits at the center of why firms must nail strategic tech planning to survive 2026 disruption.

What Altman’s moment really shows

Altman’s post captured a strange paradox. The same tools that make people faster and sometimes more creative can also shake their belief that their expertise is special.

Feeling impressed and a little useless at the same time is becoming more common. For now, even the people building these systems are wrestling with those emotions.

With the increasing use of AI, Microsoft doubles down on ethics, says AI must remain under human guidance.

What do you think about even Sam Altman feeling unsure about his place in an AI world? Share your thoughts.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content on MSN.

Read More From This Brand:

• AI tool developed by MIT boosts flu vaccine accuracy
• Software stocks are sliding, could AI change your tools?
• Meta releases AI tool that turns text commands into cleaner audio recordings