7 min read
7 min read

A group of seven Republican senators is urging the US Commerce Department to investigate potential security threats linked to the Chinese AI company DeepSeek. They want to know if the technology could be sending sensitive American information to China.
The lawmakers say it is important to understand whether personal and business data from the US might be used by foreign military-linked organizations. They believe that digging deeper into the way these AI models operate could help protect both citizens and national interests.
The senators’ letter asks for details about how Chinese AI models collect and handle information from users. They are worried that these systems could secretly transfer data to servers overseas.
They also want to know if the models are capable of accessing or using US technologies that are meant to be restricted. By asking for a formal report, they hope to make sure that all potential risks are identified before the technology spreads further.

Earlier this year, reports surfaced alleging that DeepSeek may have used U.S. AI technology without proper licensing or oversight. He warned that the government was prepared to impose new restrictions.
Such concerns have been fueled by reports claiming the company may be involved in projects that help China’s military. Officials believe that understanding these links is key to avoiding the misuse of advanced artificial intelligence tools.

DeepSeek is based in Hangzhou, China, and gained attention after announcing its AI reasoning models in January. The company claimed its tools could match or beat top US models while costing far less.
The announcement shocked the technology world, but it also sparked questions about how such rapid progress was made. Some experts suspect that US technology may have played a role in developing these systems.

In June, a senior US official said DeepSeek was supporting China’s military and intelligence operations. This claim raised new alarms in Washington about how the technology might be used.
Reports also suggested the company may have tried to work around export rules by using shell companies in Southeast Asia to buy high-end semiconductors that cannot legally be shipped to China.
Multiple US government departments have already prohibited the use of DeepSeek’s technology on their devices. This move is meant to keep sensitive work information safe from potential leaks.
These bans highlight how seriously agencies are taking the possibility of security risks from foreign AI models. Officials believe that keeping such tools off government networks is an important first step.

Some senators are backing bills that would stop DeepSeek and other similar AI systems from being used in federal agencies. The rules would also apply to government contractors.
Lawmakers argue that preventing access to these systems in sensitive environments is necessary. They say this would reduce the chances of confidential data being exposed to foreign entities.

A recent study suggested DeepSeek could be far riskier than other major AI chatbots. Researchers reportedly found it to be more likely to produce harmful or unsafe responses.
This finding has fueled arguments that certain AI models pose a bigger challenge to safety and security. It has also strengthened calls for closer examination of the technology before it is widely adopted.

The senators’ letter also stresses the need to support US-developed AI tools. They believe investing in domestic innovation will reduce reliance on foreign technologies.
By prioritizing local development, lawmakers think the country can maintain control over security standards. This approach is seen as an important part of competing in the global AI race.

A Chinese embassy spokesperson called the accusations against DeepSeek groundless. He said the government has never asked companies to collect or store data illegally.
He also criticized what he described as politicizing technology issues. According to him, China supports AI development that benefits the global community while respecting privacy laws.

Beyond the US, DeepSeek is facing scrutiny in other countries. In Germany, a privacy watchdog has reported the app to major app stores as illegal content.
Such actions show that worries about the technology are not limited to one nation. Different governments are taking steps to review the potential risks before deciding on access.

The senators are pressing the Commerce Department to investigate whether DeepSeek has illegally obtained advanced computer chips, which are essential for training powerful AI models.
These high-performance semiconductors are restricted under US export rules, limiting China’s access to them. Officials suspect the company might be sidestepping these controls by using indirect routes, such as overseas shell companies or third-party buyers.
If proven, such actions could give DeepSeek a significant technological boost while undermining US efforts to protect its most critical AI hardware from falling into foreign military-linked hands.

Lawmakers compared the current situation to the controversy over Huawei telecommunications hardware. That case led to a multibillion-dollar effort to remove the equipment from US networks.
They say this example shows how foreign technology can pose hidden risks. Acting early on potential threats from AI is seen as a way to avoid repeating past mistakes.

The senators are also asking if AI models like DeepSeek’s could be bypassing restrictions placed on US technologies. They want to know if existing rules are strong enough.
The concern is that without tighter controls, foreign companies might still find ways to use restricted tools to boost their own products. Stronger safeguards could help close those gaps.

The Commerce Department is being urged to focus on data protection through its Center for AI Standards and Innovation. This group works on creating rules for responsible AI use.
Supporters believe clear standards will help prevent misuse while allowing safe innovation. They say having guidelines in place is essential for managing the risks of advanced technology.
More firms are quietly distancing themselves from DeepSeek AI, raising fresh questions about trust, transparency, and what risks might be hiding beneath the surface.

The DeepSeek case is fueling a much bigger conversation about how the US should protect itself from possible AI security risks. For some, it feels like a warning that stronger safeguards are needed before advanced foreign technology becomes too deeply integrated into everyday life.
As officials dig deeper into the investigation, the findings could play a big role in shaping future AI laws and standards.
Cybercriminals are now disguising malware as DeepSeek AI, turning the hype around artificial intelligence into a dangerous new trap for unsuspecting users.
What do you think the US should do about foreign AI tools? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Read More From This Brand:
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN.
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
This content is exclusive for our subscribers.
Get instant FREE access to ALL of our articles.
Dan Mitchell has been in the computer industry for more than 25 years, getting started with computers at age 7 on an Apple II.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Stay up to date on all the latest tech, computing and smarter living. 100% FREE
Unsubscribe at any time. We hate spam too, don't worry.

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!