6 min read
OpenAI is considering giving the U.S. government a 5% stake worth about $43 billion as the ChatGPT maker works to strengthen its position in Washington before a possible public listing. The proposal, reported by the Financial Times and Reuters, would give taxpayers a direct financial interest in one of the world’s most valuable artificial intelligence companies.
It also shows how fast AI policy is shifting from light oversight toward a more active federal role. For OpenAI, the idea could help ease political pressure tied to jobs, data centers, national security, and who benefits from the wealth created by AI.

OpenAI has discussed granting the U.S. government a 5% equity stake as part of early talks with the Trump administration. Based on the company’s reported $852 billion valuation, that stake would be worth roughly $42.6 billion to $43 billion.
The reported offer comes as OpenAI prepares for a potential stock market listing that could value the company at about $1 trillion. At that level, a 5% government stake would be worth about $50 billion on paper, although no deal has been finalized and the structure remains uncertain.
The proposal would mark an unusual step for a private technology company preparing to go public. Instead of simply asking Washington for lighter regulation, OpenAI would give the public a direct financial claim on future gains from the AI boom.

The idea responds to a growing concern in Washington that AI could produce enormous private wealth while many workers and taxpayers absorb the disruption. The concern is not only about job losses but also about the costs of power, land, and infrastructure required for large data centers.
Sam Altman has argued that the public should share in the financial upside of artificial intelligence. OpenAI also proposed a public wealth fund in an April policy paper, saying such a fund could give citizens, including those without stock market investments, a stake in AI-driven economic growth.
That framing gives the proposal a political purpose as well as a financial one. A taxpayer stake could help OpenAI make the case that its growth is not limited to investors, employees, and corporate partners.

President Donald Trump has openly supported the idea of taxpayers holding stakes in major AI companies. Reuters reported that Trump and Senator Bernie Sanders have both backed forms of public ownership, although Sanders has proposed a much larger government stake in leading AI firms.
The Trump administration has already used equity ownership as part of industrial policy. In August 2025, the U.S. government agreed to invest $8.9 billion in Intel common stock, representing about 9.9% of the company, according to Intel and Reuters.
That Intel deal created a model for a more direct federal role in strategically important technology companies. Applying a similar idea to AI would push that model into a faster-growing and more politically sensitive sector.
The OpenAI discussions are happening as the federal government takes a closer look at advanced AI systems before release. Recent reports said the Trump administration asked OpenAI to limit the initial rollout of GPT-5.6 to approved partners while national security reviews continued.
Anthropic has also faced federal scrutiny over advanced models. Reuters reported that the U.S. allowed Anthropic to release Claude Mythos 5 to more than 100 companies and institutions after earlier restrictions tied to national security concerns.
These cases show that Washington is not treating frontier AI only as a consumer technology issue. It is increasingly treating the sector as a national security, industrial policy, and public wealth issue.
A major unresolved issue is where any government stakeholder would sit. One option discussed in reports is a sovereign wealth-style vehicle, similar in concept to funds that invest public assets for long-term returns.
Another question is whether other AI companies would be asked to contribute equity. Reuters reported that OpenAI has suggested that other U.S. AI firms could adopt a similar approach, but it remains unclear whether rivals would agree.
There are also legal and political hurdles. The Guardian reported that the plan is still conceptual and may require congressional approval, meaning the proposal could change before it becomes policy.
For OpenAI, the proposal could become part of a broader effort to reduce political risk before a public listing. A company targeting a $1 trillion valuation needs investor confidence, but it also needs a working relationship with regulators and lawmakers.
Giving the government a stake could reassure Washington that taxpayers will share in future gains. At the same time, it could raise new concerns for private investors about dilution, governance, and political influence over business decisions.
The talks also show how much AI companies are now tied to public policy. As model releases, data centers, national security reviews, and public wealth proposals collide, OpenAI’s path to market may depend as much on Washington as on product demand.
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content.
If you liked this, you might also like:
This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.
This content is exclusive for our subscribers.
Get instant FREE access to ALL of our articles.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!