Microsoft pressured to sell Teams apart from 365 amid threat of big fines

Microsoft agrees to unbundle Teams in Europe

Microsoft is taking a big step to appease regulators in Brussels by agreeing to sell Teams separately from Office 365 and Microsoft 365.

This comes after years of antitrust scrutiny over bundling practices that gave Teams a built-in advantage against competitors like Slack and Zoom.

By unbundling, Microsoft avoids the risk of massive EU fines while showing a willingness to change its product strategy. It is a calculated move to protect its broader business while reducing legal friction.

The roots of the antitrust investigation

The European Union began investigating Microsoft after Slack filed a formal complaint about Teams in July 2020. Slack argued that bundling Teams with Office unfairly restricted competition in the workplace collaboration market.

Since Office dominates enterprise software globally, any add-on packaged automatically gains millions of users.

Regulators agreed that the practice limited fair competition. This opened a lengthy investigation into whether Microsoft used its market dominance to edge out smaller, innovative rivals.

Slack’s role in the case

Slack, later acquired by Salesforce for $27.7 billion in 2021, was the original whistleblower in this case. Its leadership argued that Teams was gaining adoption not because it was superior but because it was automatically bundled with Office.

That made it harder for Slack to compete, even with better integration features and strong brand loyalty.

This case has since become symbolic of the broader challenges startups face when competing against Big Tech giants leveraging their ecosystems.

Microsoft avoids a massive fine

By agreeing to sell Teams separately, Microsoft sidesteps what could have been a record-breaking antitrust fine. The EU previously imposed multibillion-dollar penalties on tech giants like Google and Apple.

While the settlement doesn’t erase criticism of Microsoft’s practices, it represents a compromise that regulators were willing to accept.

For Microsoft, it means avoiding reputational damage and billions in financial penalties, while still keeping Teams available as an option for European customers.

New pricing for Teams and Office packages

To make the unbundling real, Microsoft introduced new pricing for European customers. Office packages without Teams will now cost €2 less per month or €24 less annually.

Customers who want Teams can still add it on, but at an additional cost of €5 per month or €60 per year.

Critics say this creates a situation where businesses might end up paying more overall, while supporters argue it gives buyers the choice regulators have been demanding.

Interoperability becomes a key condition

As part of the settlement, Microsoft agreed to unbundle Teams and make its software work more smoothly with rivals. That means improving interoperability with third-party tools like Zoom, Slack, and other collaboration platforms.

Regulators consider this essential to prevent “vendor lock-in,” where customers feel trapped in one ecosystem.

If appropriately implemented, this could create a more open, flexible work environment across Europe, reducing friction for companies that rely on mixed software stacks.

Rivals and customers show muted responses

Interestingly, rivals and customers have not strongly objected to Microsoft’s proposed settlement. Many seem satisfied that Teams will no longer be a default add-on inside Office 365.

Slack, Zoom, and others will now compete on a more equal footing, at least theoretically.

For customers, the main difference will be in how packages are priced and whether they want to add Teams separately. The lack of backlash suggests this deal is likely to move forward smoothly.

EU regulators change strategy on Big Tech

The EU has traditionally leaned heavily on massive fines to keep Big Tech in check. But this case marks a shift in approach.

Instead of hitting Microsoft with penalties, regulators opted for a settlement that changes behavior. It reflects a growing trend in Brussels: prioritize structural remedies over punishment.

Similar approaches have been used with Apple, which opened its mobile wallet tech, and Amazon, which changed its marketplace rules. Settlements like this may become the new norm.

Microsoft aligns with the Digital Markets Act

The settlement also fits Europe’s new Digital Markets Act, a sweeping law to curb anti-competitive practices among digital “gatekeepers.”

Microsoft had already made changes to comply, such as letting users uninstall Edge and Bing on Windows.

By unbundling Teams, Microsoft signals it will fall in line with EU demands before harsher measures kick in. It’s part of a larger recalibration, where Big Tech companies accept they must adapt to regional regulations.

The U.S. reacts with skepticism

Not everyone is cheering the EU’s approach. The White House has criticized Europe for targeting American tech companies disproportionately.

Some U.S. officials argue that Europe is using regulation to weaken U.S. digital dominance. Microsoft, caught in the middle, must balance regulatory compliance with geopolitical sensitivities.

While it avoids a fine, it also highlights the growing transatlantic divide over how to handle the power of Silicon Valley’s most prominent players.

Microsoft admits more work is needed

Microsoft President Brad Smith has acknowledged the company still has work to do. Last year, he admitted regulators expected additional steps beyond what Microsoft had already offered.

While the current settlement appears to satisfy Brussels, Smith’s comments show the company knows this isn’t the end.

Microsoft must prove it can foster interoperability, support rivals fairly, and keep its compliance efforts transparent. Regulators will continue watching closely to see if Microsoft lives up to its promises.

Teams remains a market leader

Despite the regulatory scrutiny, Microsoft Teams has solidified itself as one of the leading workplace collaboration tools.

While Microsoft 365 boasts hundreds of millions of users, Teams itself has tens of millions of active users worldwide, according to the most recent public figures. While the unbundling may slow automatic adoption in Europe, Teams’ momentum is unlikely to fade quickly.

For Microsoft, the real challenge is showing that Teams can thrive on its own merits, without being attached to the massive Office 365 distribution channel.

Slack and Zoom gain breathing room

For Slack and Zoom, this settlement is a small but meaningful victory. Without Teams being bundled by default, they may have an easier time pitching their products to European companies.

That doesn’t mean the playing field suddenly levels; Microsoft’s brand power and integration advantages remain significant.

Still, it creates a window of opportunity for rivals to win back customers who might have chosen Teams simply because it was included in their existing Microsoft subscription.

Microsoft tests new global strategies

One looming question is whether Microsoft will apply these changes globally or keep them limited to Europe. Offering different product bundles by region can complicate product strategy and frustrate customers.

On the other hand, expanding the unbundling beyond Europe could reduce regulatory risks elsewhere and simplify messaging.

If other governments follow the EU’s lead, Microsoft may eventually have no choice but to permanently make Teams a standalone product worldwide, changing its go-to-market strategy.

Microsoft balances profit and compliance

The financial math behind the unbundling shows Microsoft trying to thread a needle. The €2 monthly discount on Office packages without Teams looks like a concession, but adding Teams back for €5 costs more.

Some critics argue this isn’t a win for customers, while Microsoft defends the model as fair pricing. Ultimately, the company protects its revenue streams while complying with the letter of EU law. It’s a classic case of strategic compromise.

Learn how leadership changes at Microsoft are extending to GitHub with the CEO stepping down.

Europe shows it can shape global tech policy

The EU has long positioned itself as the world’s strictest regulator of technology, and this case reinforces that role.

Even without imposing a fine, Brussels forced a trillion-dollar company to change its product strategy.

That influence reminds global tech firms that European regulations can ripple across the industry. As AI and digital platforms grow more central to business and society, the EU shows it can set standards others may eventually follow.

See how Elon Musk’s bold vision of a company built entirely by AI could shake up the tech world.

What’s your take on Microsoft’s decision to unbundle Teams in Europe? Does this mark a turning point for Big Tech regulation?

Read More From This Brand:

• Microsoft chief voices concern over growing reports of AI psychosis
• Microsoft has a most wanted list, and here’s why it spells trouble for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg
• New Microsoft Teams update brings better safeguards against scams

Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content on MSN.

If you liked this story, you’ll LOVE our FREE emails. Join today and be the first to get stories like this one.

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.