8 min read
8 min read

Epic Games has launched a lawsuit against two Fortnite creators accused of using bots to fake engagement on their custom maps.
The company claims that Idris Nahdi and Ayob Nasser created more than 20,000 fake accounts to inflate their player numbers and collect payouts from the creator rewards program.
What began as a clever scam quickly evolved into a federal case, demonstrating that Epic isn’t messing around when it comes to protecting its creative ecosystem.

Fortnite’s Creator Program rewards players for creating popular custom game maps on popular islands that attract real engagement.
But these two developers allegedly used bots to mimic human players, tricking the system into thinking their creations were viral hits.
Between December 2024 and February 2025, they reportedly pocketed tens of thousands of dollars in fake engagement revenue. When Epic stopped payments, the bots vanished overnight, confirming that the activity had never been real.

Many players are unaware of the substantial revenue generated by Fortnite’s creator ecosystem. Epic pays millions of dollars each year to creators based on how long users play, the number of visits they make, and whether they spend money in-game.
It’s a massive incentive system meant to reward creativity and engagement. But schemes like this threaten its integrity, which is why Epic is drawing a hard legal line. The company argues that fake engagement robs honest creators of rightful earnings.
According to court filings, Nahdi and Nasser programmed thousands of bots using cloud gaming services to simulate real play sessions on their own Fortnite islands.
These automated accounts logged in, “played,” and interacted with maps in ways that looked legitimate to Epic’s engagement system.
The pair even spread their fake traffic across multiple maps and accounts to avoid detection. Epic estimates that between 88% and 99% of all engagement on their maps was entirely artificial.

Epic’s legal team is demanding that the scammers repay the money they earned through fraudulent activity. The company also wants to block them from creating future Epic accounts or accessing Fortnite altogether.
Epic’s lawsuit states that its actions violated its engagement payout terms and “eroded the trust” between the company and legitimate developers.
Beyond just financial consequences, Epic aims to send a clear message that cheating the system has lasting repercussions.

In one of the more bizarre details of the case, Epic’s filing asks that the lifetime ban apply not just to the defendants, but also to their “heirs and successors.”
The idea is clearly symbolized. Epic wants this judgment to remain in effect indefinitely. Still, it paints a dramatic picture of the company’s zero-tolerance stance.
It’s unlikely a court will extend the ban to the next generation, but the language shows how seriously Epic takes creator integrity.

“Botting” is a long-standing problem across the internet, from Twitch viewbotting to fake followers on social media. These bots can trick algorithms into paying out bonuses, boosting rankings, or inflating visibility.
Fortnite’s creator economy, with its millions in rewards, was bound to attract similar schemes. But Epic’s aggressive legal action sets it apart from many companies that quietly patch exploits. It’s signaling that fake activity isn’t just cheating the game, it’s stealing real money.

Epic’s filings frame the botting ring as a direct attack on the integrity of its business model. The company claims that every fake play effectively siphoned money away from other developers who rely on legitimate engagement to earn income.
In other words, Epic sees the scheme not as a game exploit but as corporate fraud. That framing could strengthen its legal position and deter other would-be scammers from gaming the system.

Epic noticed the fraud after spotting unusual traffic patterns on the defendants’ maps. The number of active players didn’t align with in-game chat, purchase behavior, or social activity.
When the company paused payments, the traffic immediately dropped, confirming the engagement wasn’t genuine.
Epic then issued a cease-and-desist order, demanding that the two stop playing Fortnite and delete all copies of the game, an order they ignored, escalating the situation into a lawsuit.

For the millions of creators using Fortnite’s tools, Epic’s lawsuit may actually be reassuring. The company’s swift action signals that it’s protecting the fairness of its payout system.
Many creators depend on those earnings as a real source of income, and fraudulent engagement undermines everyone’s work.
By drawing a legal line in the sand, Epic hopes to restore confidence among developers who fear their honest creations could be overshadowed by artificial traffic.

This isn’t Epic’s first courtroom battle with bad actors. The company has previously sued cheat sellers, tournament exploiters, and even forced banned players to issue public apologies.
Epic treats cheating not just as rule-breaking but as a moral offense that hurts the game’s culture. By taking legal action instead of just banning accounts, the company establishes public accountability and reminds everyone that Fortnite’s economy operates under real-world laws.

Epic’s Unreal Editor for Fortnite (UEFN) has turned the game into a creative platform rivaling Roblox. Anyone can design islands, custom game modes, or cinematic worlds, and earn payouts if their maps gain traction.
It’s a revolutionary model that blurs the line between player and developer. However, this also opens the door to exploitation, as seen in this case, making enforcement essential for maintaining Fortnite’s creator ecosystem as sustainable and fair as possible.

Epic’s filings emphasize that creator trust is the foundation of Fortnite’s economy. “Developers trust that the time spent creating Islands will be rewarded based on real player engagement,” the company stated.
The lawsuit argues that fake activity undermines that promise. If left unchecked, it could deter genuine creators from investing time in creating new maps. Epic’s message is clear: the community only thrives when creativity, not deception, drives success.

Unlike traditional game hacks, these scammers used cloud gaming services to power their bot army. That allowed thousands of fake accounts to run Fortnite simultaneously from remote servers, making the scheme harder to trace.
It’s a sign of how sophisticated digital fraud has become, using the same technologies that power legitimate online gaming. Epic’s crackdown could become a test case for how cloud-based exploits are handled in the legal system.

For many Fortnite players, building maps isn’t just a hobby; it’s a source of steady income. Top creators can earn tens of thousands of dollars per month, depending on their level of engagement.
Epic treats fraudulent payouts as serious financial crimes, not minor game violations. The lawsuit reinforces that Fortnite’s creative mode is part of a real economic ecosystem where fairness, accuracy, and accountability are paramount.
Epic’s crackdown highlights the seriousness of the gaming economy. See how another giant is giving back in Sony is rewarding PlayStation Plus users with free September games.

Ultimately, this lawsuit isn’t just about punishing two scammers; it’s about preserving what makes Fortnite unique.
Epic wants players to know that creativity and honesty still matter more than manipulation and shortcuts. For every fake map taken down, there are thousands of legitimate creators building real experiences.
Epic’s message to them is loud and clear: if you play fair, you’ll be rewarded. If you cheat the system, you’ll face the consequences.
Epic’s fight for fairness doesn’t end here. See how its battle with Apple is intensifying as Epic Games says Apple is blocking Fortnite in the US and EU App Stores.
What do you think about Epic doing a protest against Fortnite scammers who are stealing money by deploying bots in-game? Please share your thoughts in the comments.
Read More From This Brand:
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content on MSN.
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
This content is exclusive for our subscribers.
Get instant FREE access to ALL of our articles.
Dan Mitchell has been in the computer industry for more than 25 years, getting started with computers at age 7 on an Apple II.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Stay up to date on all the latest tech, computing and smarter living. 100% FREE
Unsubscribe at any time. We hate spam too, don't worry.

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!