6 min read
6 min read

Elon Musk’s AI company, called xAI, asked its own workers to share their personal tax returns. The goal was to use those real documents to train the company’s chatbot, Grok.
In exchange, xAI promised each worker $420. That was back in early 2026. But two months later, the money still hasn’t shown up.

The $420 amount fits a long-running Musk reference that has been associated with an illegal substance, including the 2018 Tesla “$420” going-private tweet cited in the SEC case. Bloomberg reported that xAI managers offered the same amount to workers who submitted completed tax filings for Grok training.
For employees still waiting for the payment, the delayed bonus has become a more serious workplace and privacy issue. The concern is not just the joke behind the number, but the fact that workers reportedly submitted sensitive personal financial documents before being paid.

Tax returns can include Social Security or taxpayer identification numbers, current addresses, income information, dependent details, and bank routing or account numbers used for direct deposit or payment. Bloomberg reported that xAI asked volunteers for completed tax filings and supporting documents from the current or prior tax year.
That makes the request especially sensitive because the documents involved personal financial information, not generic sample data. The reported delay in paying workers raises questions about xAI’s internal controls and how employee-submitted financial records are being handled.

When workers asked about their missing $420, they got a strange answer. The manager who ran the payment program no longer works at xAI.
That left everyone confused. No one seemed to know who had taken over, and no one could say when, or if, the money would arrive. For employees, that felt like a dead end.
Little-known fact: A spokesperson for xAI did not respond to Bloomberg’s request for comment. The company has stayed completely silent on the issue.

In February 2026, SpaceX bought xAI in a $1.25 trillion deal. After that, xAI stopped being its own company and became part of SpaceX.
Big mergers often create chaos with payroll and small payments. So the missing $420 might be a sign that xAI’s financial systems aren’t working smoothly yet.
Fun fact: This merger was the largest corporate merger by valuation in history. SpaceX was valued at $1 trillion, and xAI at $250 billion. All eleven of xAI’s original co-founders had left by late March.

xAI has gone through layoffs and restructuring, including a September 2025 cut of at least 500 data-annotation workers, about one-third of that team, according to Business Insider. The data-annotation team helped train Grok by contextualizing and categorizing raw data.
The tax-return payment dispute is separate from those layoffs, but both issues add context to concerns about xAI’s workforce management. Bloomberg reported that the unpaid tax-data bonus came during a broader overhaul involving layoffs and management changes inside the company.

Last year, xAI ran a project called Skippy. More than 200 employees recorded videos of their faces for 15 to 30 minutes each.
The company got permission to use those facial videos forever. No expiration date. No extra approval needed. That pattern, asking workers for personal data, seems to be how xAI operates.

When workers submit personal tax documents based on a promised payment, and that payment does not arrive, trust can become a workplace issue. Bloomberg reported that the unpaid $420 bonuses have hurt morale inside xAI during a period of layoffs and management changes.
The amount is small compared with xAI’s larger business, but the issue touches sensitive personal data and basic follow-through on internal commitments. That makes the dispute more than a minor payroll problem.

Americans were already turning to rival chatbots such as Anthropic’s Claude and OpenAI’s ChatGPT for accounting work before the April 15 tax deadline. xAI’s reported tax-return request was aimed at improving Grok’s tax capabilities so it could compete in that use case.
The unpaid-payment issue does not prove that Grok is falling further behind, but it does create an operational distraction around a product area that xAI was trying to improve. Business Insider has separately reported that xAI trails OpenAI and Anthropic in scale and reach.

xAI has already moved into government AI work through xAI for Government, including a reported $200 million ceiling contract with the U.S. Department of Defense and availability through the GSA schedule. GSA later announced a OneGov agreement, making Grok models available to federal agencies for $0.42 per organization for 18 months.
The unpaid tax data bonuses could add to scrutiny of xAI’s data-handling practices, especially because government buyers often evaluate security, privacy, and vendor reliability. The stronger factual framing is that the episode may raise questions, not that it has already cost xAI contracts.

SpaceX is aiming to list shares as early as June 12, 2026, on Nasdaq, with a possible $75 billion raise at a roughly $1.75 trillion valuation. That target would be higher than the $1.25 trillion combined valuation set when SpaceX merged with xAI in February.
The xAI tax-data dispute is not, by itself, evidence that SpaceX’s IPO will be damaged. A safer framing is that it adds to the governance and operational questions investors may weigh as SpaceX prepares for a public-market debut.

Grok and X have already faced regulatory and legal scrutiny over AI-generated sexualized or nonconsensual imagery. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office opened a formal investigation into X and xAI, and French authorities have also examined Grok-generated explicit deepfake concerns.
The unpaid tax-return payments are a separate issue, but they add another privacy-sensitive data concern around xAI. Regulators and public agencies may view the episode alongside broader questions about how the company collects, safeguards, and uses personal data.
Musk’s AI ambitions aren’t the only thing worth watching right now. Check out Elon Musk’s signals for a possible public future for SpaceX.

This story isn’t just about one company. It shows how AI labs sometimes cut corners to get real data fast, even asking their own workers for super private information.
As AI grows, we all need to ask, “Who owns your data? And what happens when a company promises something but doesn’t deliver?” That’s a question worth remembering next time you’re asked to share.
Questions about accountability don’t stop with AI companies. Check out Elon Musk heads to court over Twitter stock allegations.
Enjoyed this slideshow? Hit the like button and drop a comment below. Would you trust an AI company with your tax return?
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content on MSN.
Read More From This Brand:
This content is exclusive for our subscribers.
Get instant FREE access to ALL of our articles.
Father, tech enthusiast, pilot and traveler. Trying to stay up to date with all of the latest and greatest tech trends that are shaping out daily lives.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Stay up to date on all the latest tech, computing and smarter living. 100% FREE
Unsubscribe at any time. We hate spam too, don't worry.

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!